Authors

1 Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Microbiology Research Center (MRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

3 Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4 Department of Medical Bactriology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

5 Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background: Abnormalities in mitosis parameter and cycle cell program are announced to be based on both the cell proliferation conditions and the condition of the metaphases of each person to respond to Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) working condition. The aim of the current research is hence to comparison of mitotic index outcome in the individuals of normal volunteers involved in two different period of culture with effect of PHA.
Methods: Comparison of healthy human donors lymphocytes were cultured for 48-h and 72-h and using conventional karyotype technique with minor modification.
Results: Mitotic index and cell proliferation frequency were analyzed in the individuals of normal blood donors after preparing of colchcine to cultured metaphases 2 hours before cell fixation at. The metaphases indics at 48-h and 72-h culture period maintained a perfect yield level. Lymphocytes populations in 72-houres laboratory work were more than 48-h cultures (2.73% at 72 hours vs. 1.48% at 48 hours, p ≤ 0.05).
Conclusion: The present research indicates significant comparisons for laboratories and individuals to be set up. With effect of these results it may help in time consuming and short time period for patient, as well as fresh suggestion for health care management decision. Reagent, manual, budget, time for diagnosis, and health care fulfillment may resolve of this proposal
 

Keywords

  1. Masoudzadeh N, Teimourian S. Comparison of quantitative
    fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and
    karyotype analysis for prenatal screening of chromosomal
    aneuploidies in 270 amniotic fluid samples. J
    Perinat Med 2019 Aug 27;47(6):631-6. doi: 10.1515/
    jpm-0069.
    2. Fabrice TN, Cherkezyan L, Ringli C, Baroux C.
    Transmission Electron Microscopy Imaging to Analyze
    Chromatin Density Distribution at the Nanoscale
    Level. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1675:633-51. doi:
    10.1007/978-1-4939-7318-7_34.
    3. Battaglia, Emilio. Nucleosome and nucleotype: a
    terminological criticism. Caryologia 2018; 47: 193–
    197.
    4. Guo L, Accorsi A, He S, et al. An adaptable chromosome
    preparation methodology for use in invertebrate
    research organisms. BMC Biol. 2018 Feb
    26;16(1):25.
    5. Perkins AT, Bickel SE. Using Fluorescence In
    Situ Hybridization (FISH) to Monitor the State of
    Arm Cohesion in Prometaphase and Metaphase I
    Drosophila Oocytes. J Vis Exp. 2017 Dec 6;(130).
    doi: 10.3791/56802.
    6. Movafagh A, Varma N, Varma S. Co-expression of
    two FAB-specific chromosome changes, t(15;17)
    and t(8;21), in a case of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
    Ann Hematol 1996 Jun;72(6):375-7.
    7.Rawojć K, Miszczyk J, Możdżeń A, et al. Evaluation
    of the premature chromosome condensation scoring
    protocol after proton and X-ray irradiation of human
    peripheral blood lymphocytes at high doses range.
    Int J Radiat Biol 2018 Nov;94(11):996-1005. doi:
    10.1080/09553002.2018.1490038.
    8.Teye K, Hamada T, Krol RP, et al. Homozygous deletion
    of six genes including corneodesmosin on chromosome
    6p21.3 is associated with generalized peeling
    skin disease. J Dermatol Sci. 2014 Jul;75(1):36-42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.04.003.
    9.Zheng J, Yang X, Lu H, et al.Prenatal diagnosis of sex
    chromosome mosaicism with two marker chromosomes
    in three cell lines and a review of the literature.
    Mol Med Rep. 2019 Mar;19(3):1791-1796. doi:
    10.3892/mmr.2018.9798.
    10.Patel A. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Using
    Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on DNA
    from Amniotic Fluid and Chorionic Villus Sampling.
    Methods Mol Biol 2019;1885:171-86. doi:
    10.1007/978-1-4939-8889-1_12.
    11.Nicholas R. Abu-Absi, Friedrich Srienc Instantaneous
    evaluation of mammalian cell culture growth
    rates through analysis of the mitotic index Journal of
    Biotechnology 95 (2002) 63–84
    12.Scarpato R, Migliore L. Comparison of spontaneous
    structural chromosome aberration frequency in 48 hcultured
    human lymphocytes mitotically arrested by
    different colcemid treatments. Mutat Res 1996 Sep
    26;361(1):35-9.
  2. 13.Andersson HC. The spontaneous frequency of chromosomal
    aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges
    in cultured peripheral lymphocytes of a single blood
    donor sampled more than 200 times. Mutat Res 1993
    Apr;286(2):281-92.
    14.Speit G. Does the recommended lymphocyte cytokinesis-
    block micronucleus assay for human biomonitoring
    actually detect DNA damage induced by occupational
    and environmental exposure to genotoxic
    chemicals? Mutagenesis 2013 Jul;28(4):375-80. doi:
    10.1093/mutage/get026.
    15.Ashby J. Comparison of techniques for monitoring
    human exposure to genotoxic chemicals. Mutat Res
    1988 Mar;204(3):543-51.
    16.Delaunay L N. Comparative karyological study of
    species Muscari Mill. and Bellevalia Lapeyr Bulletin
    of the Tiflis Botanical Garden 2015, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-32.
    17.Stevens-Kroef M, Simons A, Rack K, et al. Cytogenetic
    Nomenclature andReporting. Methods Mol
    Biol 2017;1541:303-309. Review. PubMed PMID:
    27910032.
    18.Sinha AK, Linscombe VA, Gollapudi BB, et al. The
    incidence of spontaneous cytogenetic aberrations in
    lymphocytes cultured from normal humans for 48
    and 72 h. Can J Genet Cytol 1984 Oct;26(5):528-31.
    19.Salas PC, Vázquez-Rico I, León-Justel A,et al. Effectiveness
    of QF-PCR, karyotyping and microarray in
    detecting clinically significant chromosomal aberrations
    of foetuses with abnormal findings on ultrasound.
    J Mol Genet Med 2018;12:344.
    20.Casella M, Lucarelli M, Simili M, e al. Spontaneous
    chromosome loss and colcemid resistance in lymphocytes
    from patients with myotonic dystrophy type
    1. Cytogenet Genome Res 2003;100(1-4):224-9.
    21.Dutta A, De R, Dolai TK, Mitra PK,et al. Cytogenetic
    study is not essential in patients with aplastic
    anemia. Am J Blood Res 2017 Nov1;7(5):49-58.
    22. Movafagh A, Mirfakhraei R, Mousavi-Jarrahi A.
    Frequent incidence of double minute chromosomes
    in cancers, with special up-to-date reference to leukemia.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(12):3453-6.
  3. 23. Movafagh A, Maleki F, Fadaie S, et al. Persistent
    unstable chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes
    of radiotherapy workers after 1st mitotic division in
    Tehran, Iran. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
    2007; 23, 254-8.
    24. Evans HJ, O’Riordan ML. Human peripheral blood
    lymphocytes for the analysis of chromosome aberrations
    in mutagen tests. Mutat Res 1975: 31, 135-148.
  4. 25.Schoenherr I, Stapp T, Ryll T. A comparison of different
    methods to determine the end of exponential
    growth in CHO cell cultures for optimization of scaleup.
    Biotechnol Prog 2000 Sep-Oct;16(5):815-21.
    26.Nagasaka K, Hossain MJ, Roberti MJ, et al. Sister
    chromatid resolution is an intrinsic part of chromosome
    organization in prophase. Nat Cell Biol 2016
    Jun;18(6):692-9. doi: 10.1038/ncb3353.